Over 59029
politifake

Scam Politics


TUSCON, ARIZONA 2/22/2013 - Accenture Golf Tournament postponed due to snow. Just another day of man-made Global Warming Hell. It's all your fault. Repent!


TAGS: anthroprogenicanthropogenic global warming scam
Rating: 4.23/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

Jamison12 - August 31, 2014, 8:54 pm
There's a difference between weather and climate.
StoneTools - September 8, 2013, 7:16 pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10294082/Global-warming-No-actually-were-cooling-claim-scientists.html


CLIMATE CHANGE IS A HOAX - Global Climate Change, Inc. Est. 4,000,000,000 B.C.


TAGS: scam
Rating: 4.81/5

More politifakes by vbattaile



THE FLEECING OF AMERICA - America, what's in your wallets?


TAGS: scam
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by JGalt



Global Warming Is A Hoax -




THE GLOBAL WARMING SCAM - Just Another Path To Socialist Control. If Global Warming is Man-Made, what got us out of the last Ice Age? Woolly Mammoth Farts. Consensus is not science. Man is not the problem.


TAGS: scam
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by vbattaile

OTC - June 18, 2014, 1:00 am
What's the normal temperature of the earth? maybe the increase is still below the normal temperature. Maybe it always warms up before an ice age. Maybe the '70s Time article was right about the coming ice age. maybe we should all migrate to Mars
Zeitguy - June 17, 2014, 11:50 pm
The political impetus to dismiss the inherit economical value of renewable energy sources is illustrative of the lack of governmental intellect. .
Zeitguy - June 17, 2014, 11:42 pm
Stop: The Earth is warming: Over the last 100 years the earth has increases it's average temp by 1.2 degrees F. Now that may not be that much of an increase by the general public; but by statisticians and scientists that is catastrophic!
arnnatz - October 4, 2012, 7:39 pm
but, Albuquerque, USA isn't a problem as much as say, Paris, USA (we have a b*** load of Paris's in the USA)
arnnatz - October 4, 2012, 7:37 pm
moo+, in my case, and I suspect most Americans who don't live near the border, I don't know the province layout, so we do the same we do with, say, france where we refer to paris, france not Paris, Île-de-France, France
Airman - October 4, 2012, 7:05 pm
all part of being Americas hat
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2012, 5:33 pm

exactly, I watch TV and anytime they mention Canada it's "Winnipeg, Canada" or "Toronto, Canada". ....I don't get why?, It's a pretty big place, we've divided it into provinces for simplicity's sake.
crankyhead - October 4, 2012, 5:04 pm
Air, I think he was referring to 'Vancouver, Canada', instead of 'Vancouver, British Columbia'.
Airman - October 4, 2012, 4:54 pm
we say albuquerque, new mexico and denver, colorado.. (states).. we never say the country. BUT, New Mexico puts USA on their plates so there's no confusion with Mexico the country for easterners who have no clue of anything west of the hudson river
crankyhead - October 4, 2012, 4:15 pm
Not only is it crazy, it's also factually inaccurate, at least according to the people who collect the weather data.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2012, 10:37 am

BTW, why do Americans always name the city and country but not the province?....It's like if I said I was in Albuquerque America.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 4, 2012, 9:19 am

That's crazy, The rest of the country reported record highs. BC get's all the breaks.
arnnatz - October 4, 2012, 8:37 am
I was just in Vancouver Canada and they were saying that they have had the coolest summer in memory this year. Funny that they would be exempt from "Global" warming.
SethMythrax - October 4, 2012, 6:49 am
Its called climate change & the lack of Ice this year in the Arctic proves the Arctic is melting. It is a 25000 yr cycle & man has nothing to do with it. Probably responsible for mass extinctions of many species too.


Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -


TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward


GREEN ENERGY - A mythological, unworkable concept used by libs in order to channel billions of tax $ to Democrats.




Eco-Pope Francis -




Idiot In Chief Obama -




"HALLELUJAH" - Obama: I Say My Prayers Every Night! I'll stand before the Lord With nothing on my tongue but i prayed?




Liberal Science Deniers -




NEVER WAS - It's a scam, and that's all that it ever was.




GLOBAL WARMING - What part of "Natural Cycle" don't you understand?




Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


Whoopi Goldberg -


TAGS: welfare scam to keep you enslaved in trade for democrat votes
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by OTC

foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 1:13 pm
"I'm new here, idiot?" LOL. Bye, vicky...
foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 1:07 pm
There is a difference between being anti-welfare and wanting people to be able to be off welfare. Democrsts equate wanting to get folks off welfare as being anti-welfare. That is how they kept folks enslaved to welfare
foxrecon19d - May 28, 2014, 1:02 pm
Welfare is a good program. It a**ists folks to survive until that person is capable to be self reliant. In America, the Democrat party uses welfare to enslave people to government. Three-four generations of blacks being on welfare is not progress.
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:46 am
what i really dont like about welfare is the fact that veterans dont get any. the way the US treats its war veterans is atrocious, they get almost nothing, and yet billions of dollars each year goes to corporate welfare...
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:33 am
how about you get fired in a bad economy and struggle to for a year competing with thousands of people for a handful of jobs while homeless? unemployment is a hole, its virtually impossible to get a job when you're homeless and have to beg on the street.
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:30 am
i guess your view of welfare changes when you've been through a stage in your life where receiving welfare was the difference between being "ready for a job" or "homeless and unemployable"
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:29 am
i dont know what the US system is like, but in australia, welfare takes up 1/3 of the budget, and when i'm done with my degree i'll happily pay a decent chunk of my wage to know that others who were in my position wont be reliant upon charitable donations
terroraustralis - May 28, 2014, 4:27 am
as a 2nd year university student who relies in welfare, i have to disagree. it gives enormous freedom in terms of not having to worry about immediate survival (I.E. food, accomodation, etc). my parents pay 3-4x more in taxes than i receive for study.
fauxnews - May 27, 2014, 8:46 pm
LOL
Mooooooooooooooooooo - May 27, 2014, 8:39 pm

bye Vicky
fauxnews - May 27, 2014, 8:07 pm
Vik, I'd ask how old you are but I know you cant count that high. X-D The more you hit on TerrorAustralis, the more he's going to tell you to f*** off.We get it,you're a girl,you're just not his type.Save your breath...You'll need it to blow up your date.
foxrecon19d - May 27, 2014, 4:00 pm
Get off terroraustralis' back. Granted, I do not agree with him that pandering to moderates by not talking about getting folks off welfare and being self dependent...wait, he said that? Never mind. Get off terror's back. He means well
OTC - May 27, 2014, 7:42 am
Being on welfare is a big problem. It restricts your abilities and enslaves you to the bureaucracy
terroraustralis - May 27, 2014, 7:09 am
do yourself a favour, drop the "anti-welfare" bull****, because it drives moderates away. there are much bigger problems to deal with.


OBAMANOCCHIO - if the watchdog media (vs current lapdog media) were in charge- this be what u see in the scampaign season 2012! Growin a foot by the minute!!!




NASA – CO2 is a Global Coolant -




SOLAR-GATE - Not going away.




RELIGION - The oldest scam in the (Good) Book.




Yoda Wisdom -




" FISKER KARMA – HALF A BILLION FEDERAL DOLLARS. " - Fisker is manufacturing these gorgeous Leonardo DiCaprio toys in Finland. Creating 500 jobs overseas with American taxpayers’ money. “All the choices we've made have been the right ones”




FROM UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS... - TO UNDOCUMENTED VOTERS




" 05 MAY 2012 SCOTLAND " - Obama "I will be very clear in voicing my belief that we're going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way."




scamalot -




CLIMATE CHANGE: A BOGUS CRISIS - invented by the Left to destroy capitalism and freedom. The Global Warming Scam: Just Another Path To Socialist Control




Weather Warning -




" GLOBAL WARMING & GREEN ENERGY SCAM " - Obama: "I will be very clear in voicing my belief that we're going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way."




IMMUTABLE TRUTH - The green agenda just drives us much more deeper in the red.




"Children won't know Snow" -




Sweet deal -




SHOVEL READY JOBS??? - America Believed Obama 4 years ago. Why should they believe him now??? Fool us once, shame on you, fool us twice, shame on America!




" RORSCHACH INKBLOTS " - Make more sense than Obama pushing for Solar Energy. German and Chinese Solar Firms Battle for Survival.




REPUBLICANS CRITICAL OF NAVY'S 'GREAT GREEN FLEET', $26 A GALLON FUEL. - The so-called "drop-in" fuels are derived from seeds, algae and chicken fat. Anyone interested in a bridge for sale?




QUESTION: WHAT PRINCIPLES OF CONDUCT DOES SOLAR HAVE? - 1) Ram through gov't loans. 2) Give gov't loans only to Democrats 3) Give lots of $$ to The Clown.




" OBAMANOMICS " - Suppose you could produce $50 of electricity but it cost you $100 to do so. Would that make any sense? It would if you work at the White House.




THIS IS HOW DEMOCRATS - write and pass legislature.




camelot -


TAGS: scamalot
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by JGalt



SOOOOOOOO - Who is going to jail for this? Anyone? Steven Chu is the new Bernie Madhoff. Solar ponzi scheme




DID YOU EVER NOTICE ... - ... how Green prophecies and projections continue to fail spectacularly. And as they do, the volume and shrillness from the Sacred Church of the Global Warming increases.




POP! - goes the bubble of The Clown's phantom green jobs.




" IF THE GREEN GLOVE FITS " - Obama has promised to create 5 million "green-collar jobs". Seen any lately?




Dr Seuss -


TAGS: scam i am
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by JGalt



PROPHECY FAIL - THE SCAM IS OVER - Data shows that Global Warming is the Religion of the Stupid. Search continues for UN's 50 million missing climate refugees.




CALL AL GORE - We gotta stop using the term "Global warming". How about "Climate change?"




" HAPPY EASTER " - Global Warming hits the Easter Bunny hard.




DONALD BERWICK - Obama and the Democrats in Congress said that Obamacare wouldn't lead to rationing of healthcare. That leaves only two options: They're either stupid or they lied.




AMERICA - Paying for the corruptions of the past With the generations of the future




LONDON 2012 UNVEILS "GOLDEN CHEESEGRATER" OLYMPIC TORCH". - A promise that the torch would be carbon-free failed to materialise.




Uh-oh, Greenies! -


TAGS: global warming hoax climate change scam electric cars fossil fuels carbon co2 coal powered cars alarmist fail silly greenies
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 28, 2015, 12:15 pm
I used to make this argument myself but actually, it does burn less and is more efficient to have one large plant everyone ***s into, rather than run millions of independent, small internal combustion engines. It's probably not a large difference though.


Democrat War On Coal -




Global Warming Junk Science -




The Clinton Foundation -




Commiefornia Gov. Moonbeam Proves Yet Again He's a Moronic Moonbat -




Has Anybody Told the DNC What Obama’s EPA Just Announced About Airplane Emissions? -




Eco-Fascists: The "Green Wing" of the Nazi Party -


TAGS: eco fascists green wing nazi party green religion greenies alarmists warmists socialism climate change junk science global warming scam agenda21 hysterians
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 27, 2015, 3:40 am
"A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire :P
fauxnews - April 26, 2015, 11:04 pm
"I have a theory that you can make any sentence seem profound by writing the name of a dead philosopher at the end of it. -Plato." (Banksy) www.twitter.com/SteveCarell/status/583642179710496769
calron - April 26, 2015, 7:59 pm
"There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as moral indignation, which permits envy or hate to be acted out under the guise of virtue." — Erich Fromm


The Father of Global Warming -




The Father of Global Warming -




GloBULL Warming -




2014 Was NOT The Warmest Year Ever -


TAGS: climate change hoax global warming scam junk science al gore ipcc nasa urban heat island effect satellite temperatures
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - March 21, 2015, 11:18 pm
You forgot to account for the "data adjustment: that turned a cooling trend into a warming trend.


An Inconvenient Truth -




Whiny Liberal Crybabies Throw a Wet Blanket on the 4th of July Because It's Bad for Gaia -




Climate Change -




Climategate -




I'll Observe Earth Day... -




EPA's Green Tyranny -




Greenpeace Hypocrisy -




Climate Change Clown -




UN Climate Czar: Communism is Best to Fight Global Warming -




EPA Tyrant: "Yes, Our New Regulations Are Going to Make Lower Income People Take it in the A$$" -




Stupid Climate Alarmists -


TAGS: climate alarmists warmists greenies hysterians global warming hoax climate change stupidity scam fraud eco fascism al gore ipcc liberals progressives democrats socialism globalization nwo agenda 21 statism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 5:29 pm
What about it would "tick me" off, Curly? :) I rarely comment on his "parodies." Anytime I am having a restless night and in need of a sedative, I always know where to turn - albeit, these short-form ones are an anomaly, being the exception to that rule.
Curlyrocks - May 7, 2015, 5:08 pm
I know what you mean. I was going to blow by it, saw that something about it had ticked you you off, read it, and gave it 5L. Well said CI
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 11:23 am
I love it how, regardless of our all differences, we are all in agreement (mostly through habit) to ignore the "contributions" from… wait for it… dunh dunh dunh…. TheConservativeInsurgent :)


Civil Forfeiture -




Climate Change: The Greatest Hoax Of The Modern Era -




Global Warming Alarmists' New Claim: Satellites Are Lying -


TAGS: global warming hoax satellite temperature data climate change scam junk science the pause warmists alarmists hysterians ipcc nasa al gore john christy deniers skeptics greenies green religion eco fascism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 12, 2016, 2:12 am
There is also the U.S. Climate Reference Network USCRN witch [sic] is supposed to be so accurate that its numbers never need adjusting. It shows a declaine in US temp where the adjusted number show an increase.


Warmist Stupidity -




The Party of Science -




Surprise, Surprise: Monetary Redistribution Plan Is Key For Upcoming Paris Climate Change Talks -




Environmental Wackos -




Radical Environmentalism Seeks Death Of Capitalism -




Global Warming Hysterian -


TAGS: al gore global warming hysterian climate change hoax scam fraud green religion greenies alarmists warmists ipcc inconvenient truth eco fascism junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 3, 2015, 11:49 pm
There's a reason I call Gore The Profit of Global Warming. He made a lot of dough off the hysteria he spreads, but that doesn't make the theory itself invalid.


Alarmists, Alinskyites & Rules For Radicals -




A Scientist Who Reversed His Belief In Global Warming -




Ironies Abound -




Eco-Fascism: Global Warming Junk Scientists Want Obama to Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics -


TAGS: eco fascism global warming junk scientists climate change hoax scam ipcc al gore rico warmists alarmists greenies green tyranny gia mother earth hysterians agenda 21
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

ipaprime - September 20, 2015, 4:29 am
little o won't do it cause then the MMCC crowd wil have to explain why their data was manipulate, their models haven't been correct, and all those other pesky problems they are having proving their point.


Solazyme: Another Example of Green Cronyism & Corruption -




The Drunk, Brain-Dead Human Gaffe Machine -




Warmists are NOT smarter than a 5th Grader -




The Idiocy of MSNBC's "Science" Reporting On Full Display -


TAGS: global warming hoax climate change scam msnbs science deniers warmists alarmists liberal moonbats greenies eco fascism al gore msm
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Libertas - November 9, 2015, 10:39 pm
pretty much proves that liberals and science are incompatible.


We're Saved!!! -




Obama's Green Energy Crony Corporatism -




Hillary the Scamburglar -




Warmist Stupidity -




UN Climate Scientists WRONG AGAIN -




Warmist Stupidity On Display -




Takes One To Know One -




Obama Makes It Rain -




Obama the Debt Crater -




scam-wow -




Obama's Green Fascism -


TAGS: obama regime fascism oil tax energy prices skyrocket eco tyranny global warming alarmist warmist climate change hoax scam war on oil
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 6, 2016, 2:59 am
Of course Obama said that high gas prices hurt the poor. http://junkscience.com/2016/02/flashback-obama-on-raising-gas-taxes-it-hurts-families-and-businesses/
Bandit5906 - February 5, 2016, 8:46 pm
Continuing with the destruction of America 5L


Warmist Stupidity -




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE